6/7/2023 0 Comments Wolfram siemann metternich17) have suffered from the problems mentioned above: their authors were anything but impartial, and all of them based their works on a highly limited number of primary sources: they usually compiled source material from older books and articles and interspersed their texts with some letters from the eight volumes of Metternich’s correspondence published by his son Richard in the 1880s, or with some other volumes of the published correspondence of Metternich’s collaborators and other contemporaries. Around 30 biographies noted by Siemann for the period from 1836 to 2016 (p. Without exaggeration, no biography has been written on Metternich that meets such high standards of historical scholarship as the publication of Wolfram Siemann’s voluminous monograph published by C.H. The scholarly value of numerous historical works on this man and his accomplishments has been marred by the biased attitudes of their authors, their unwillingness to study primary sources, and, therefore, their surprising inclination to adopt many myths and superficial assessments of this statesman. It would be difficult to find anyone treated more unjustly and superficially by historians than Austrian Chancellor Klemens Wenzel Lothar Nepomuk Prince von Metternich-Winneburg (1773–1859).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |